Search for: "JOHN BARNES"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
” Robert Barnes reports in The Washington Post that Chief Justice John Roberts said on Tuesday that “the Supreme Court has gone about its work in a ‘completely nonpartisan way’ since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but that the bitter political battle waged over confirming Scalia’s replacement poses a ‘real danger’ for the court. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm
This blog provides pictures taken by the court of the private ceremony at the Supreme Court at which Chief Justice John Roberts administered the constitutional oath to Gorsuch. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Coverage comes from Robert Barnes and Keith Alexander in The Washington Post, who report that “the two former prosecutors on the Supreme Court — Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Samuel A. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Coverage comes from David Savage in the Los Angeles Times, Nina Totenberg at NPR, and Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reviews several Gorsuch rulings that “liberal and conservative legal activists” “say best illustrate how Gorsuch sees the law. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ed O’Keefe report that “Senate Democrats are requesting more information about Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s role defending the George W. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
It is hardly a feasible judicial function to decide whether shoestores should sell single shoes to one-legged persons and if so at what price, or how many Braille books the Borders or Barnes and Noble bookstore chains should stock in each of their stores. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
Supreme Court’s Presumption of Judicial Review Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, the Supreme Court has relied on a strong presumption that judicial review is available for executive branch action.[4] Agency decisions are presumed to be reviewable, and preclusion statutes are construed narrowly. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am
Johnson The Hospital-Physician Relationship - John D. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Additional coverage of the order in the Texas case comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who notes that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes considers the role Chief Justice John Roberts will play in the inauguration, noting that Donald Trump criticized Roberts on the campaign trail, but concluding that if “there is any tension between Roberts and Trump, it probably will not be evident from the chief justice’s demeanor. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
At Fortune, Jeff John Roberts looks at the top candidates, observing that although “Democrats will not be thrilled by any of the picks, they are likely go to the barricades if the President-elect proposes Judge William Pryor Jr., who has described the landmark 1974 abortion ruling Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
The trial judge, Justice Barnes, ruled that the browsewrap terms in issue were not binding on Ms Marsden. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 5:35 pm
Access Chief Justice John G. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
Hard fought appeal by Montana AFPD John Rhodes.Facts: Loftis is charged with wire fraud, for allegedly victimizing investors through falserepresentations. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:06 pm
Then we have trial consultant responses from Jennifer Cox and Stan Brodsky, John Gilleland, and Elaine Lewis and a final reply from the authors. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), John Blume weighs in on Moore v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
John McCain, who had appeared to walk back his initial pledge to block any Supreme Court nominees if Hillary Clinton wins tomorrow, has “returned to his original threat. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
Additional coverage of the White House response comes from Nicole Duran at the Washington Examiner and John Bennett at Roll Call. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:33 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that the first oral argument of October Term 2016, which featured five male justices, three female justices, and two female advocates, brought something unusual to the Supreme Court chamber: “gender equality”; he notes such gender parity is especially rare because “the percentage of female advocates with résumé-making appearances before the justices is surprisingly low. [read post]
