Search for: "JOHN DOE AND PREDECESSORS"
Results 601 - 620
of 759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
’ The two newest Justices are not voting as their predecessors did — so far, at least. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
The evidence does not bear this out. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
So he found a small group of lawyers in the OLC, headed by John Yoo, and asked for their opinions. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
But it does not extend to noncapital cases, and no comparable bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
As to the CAFC indication that the Board may look at "illustrations of the mark as actually used," that is of little help when, as here, that application is based on intent-to-use.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:52 pm
And it may be--it does seem to have been--O'Neal's mismanagement that led to the semi-collapse of Merrill. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:58 am
Even in that case, in which it is not a choice between targeted killing and detention, the CIA still does not want custody, even though the article says that experts believe that the CIA could get far more and better information if it controlled the detention and interrogation process. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Since Cunningham has acknowledged that he was not a Town resident when he was appointed to this position, and does not intend to become one in the future, his appointment as Commissioner of Public Works does not comport with relevant state law and is invalid. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm
On the basis of Mr Hemming’s question the injunction does not seem to have been a super-injunction in the ordinary sense – that is an injunction preventing the reporting of its own existence. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
On the basis of Mr Hemming’s question the injunction does not seem to have been a super-injunction in the ordinary sense – that is an injunction preventing the reporting of its own existence. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
Mr Browne also submitted that the case plainly does not fall within the Jameel jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:21 pm
Notice how the conclusion does not even begin to follow from the premise. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
As one of the groups exploiting the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision to allow unlimited spending by corporations to influence election outcomes, it does not disclose its donors and it does not report its expenditures on so-called "issue ads. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:20 pm
Unfortunately, under the reported bill, settlements would be made presumptively unlawful, but the bill does not create a process for quickly resolving whether the agreement is unlawful. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
By Steven G. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
" John Doe Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:31 pm
O'Neil, A Response to John T. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:32 am
This does not mean the Senators should vote "yes". [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
In a recent online discussion, I came across the following, with reference to John Ashcroft:"Wasn't he the one who ordered clothing be put over statues of women with naked boobies? [read post]
