Search for: "Jackson v. Virginia" Results 601 - 620 of 697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am by Alicia Maule
Virginia (2002) is that they present a special risk of wrongful conviction. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:26 am
Deprive citizens of honest services by wire fraud related to a telephone call from Jefferson in Ghana to Vernon Jackson in Louisville, Ky., discussing the progress of meetings with Ghanaian officials. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:34 am by Russ Bensing
”  The 9th Circuit based its decision on Jackson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
McDaniel, Case Western Reserve University, “‘Her house was no longer hers entirely:’ Legal Classification and the Law of Intestacy in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando”Katherine Gilbert, Drury University, “‘There is no private life which has not been determined by a wider public life:’ George Eliot’s Felix Holt (1866)” 10:45-11:00 Break Coffee/Tea SECOND SET OF PANELS 11:00-12:15 Panel 1: Literature, Law and Shakespeare’s Measure for… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am by Beck/Herrmann
Then you've got West Virginia, but nobody else, rejecting the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
  The plaintiff was an inmate serving a fifty-year sentence in the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:16 am by Eric Claeys
Jackson Women's Health Center is currently before the Supreme Court, and the litigants in Dobbs believe that the case presents the question whether Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]