Search for: "Jefferson v Long" Results 601 - 620 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Washington explained the core to Jefferson in far off Paris, saying he would not much object to any of the Anti-Federalist proposed amendments on rights, but he objected to their proposed prohibition of federal direct tax, “which is the one they most strenuously insist on. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
“Courts have long recognized . . . that one may be held liable for the infringing acts of another. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am by Guest Author
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thomas Jefferson’s understanding of the Constitution and republicanism is understood in contrast to John Taylor’s and William Manning’s. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Justice Quince is asking the right questions   In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
That said, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Republicans can maintain complete control over every aspect of the upcoming proceeding so long as they maintain a solid block of 51 votes. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:26 pm
The name refers to the 1971 Supreme Court case of Bivens v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 10:37 pm
Tom Nachbar, Virginia: Jefferson made today's argument: intellectual products are not like tangible property because they are nonrivalrous. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Impounding appropriate money was first done by President Thomas Jefferson and was long considered an inherent presidential power. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:31 am by Ilya Somin
That said, the Court's public image has bounced back from many previous controversies that critics claimed would erode its legitimacy (including Bush v. [read post]