Search for: "John Doe (B)"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
By John M. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:10 am
This issue, as with similar ex part examination matters, does not form a basis for cancellation.As to (2), the submission of an amended drawing does not require verification. and the submission does not raise the issue of opposer's bona fide intent. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
Baroness Hale repeated in B (Children) [2008] UKHL 35: Taking a child away from her family is a momentous step, not only for her, but for her whole family, and for the local authority which does so. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
B. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:28 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
Moses, David B. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
John D. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
It refers to the Patent Office's Licensing and Review function, which is an early screening function applicable to all provisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(b), nonprovisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), and international applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
John Hancock Life Ins. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:49 am
”- “What does it mean to be an at-will employee? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
It is true that Chief Justice Roger B. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
JOHN DOE, Defendant.Case Number: O-2004-1175COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 1; 127 P.3d 1135; 2006 Okla. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Christina Costley at (805) 879-1818. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
Stephen B. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
B-K Lighting v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
In Jennings, the court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not give detained immigrants the right to periodic bond hearings at six-month intervals. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:31 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Last Friday, John Jenkins wrote about another momentous ruling by Chancellor Kathaleen St. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:48 am
§ 1071(b)(4)): The Federal Circuit reviews PTO decisions from the perspective of the agency’s presumptive validity, and a district court does not. [read post]
