Search for: "John Doe Corporation and/or Limited Liability Company"
Results 601 - 620
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
In 1986, Manhattan federal bankruptcy court issued a landmark reorganization plan that discharged Johns-Manville Corporation and its indemnity insurers from future asbestos-related liability (“Manville Confirmation Order”). [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
GM has faced possible tax liabilities triggered by a technical ownership change because of a broad debt-for-equity swap the company has undertaken as part of its federally mandated restructuring. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
" The court distinguished Gottlieb's case authorities "because they do not involve limited liability companies. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(China Law Blog) Poisonous Optima dog food: product liability or blame the counterfeiters? [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
The court held that a "misrepresentation" based entirely on product labeling-based wasn't bound by the limits of product liability law. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
” Based on these finding, one may ask: does food irradiation represent an opportunity to improve consumer confidence in the safety of fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach? [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Following a six-week trial before Judge John Koeltl, a jury decided that Bank of America should pay $141 million in a civil fraud case that centered on its sale of asset-backed securities. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Protection from criminal liability is currently under House debate in Louisiana. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
"Not surprisingly, John's concerns largely parallel ours. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Senators Specter and Leahy express concern about ACTA Treaty (Techdirt) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Justice) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) Commerce Department cites questionable stats, Chamber of Commerce uses them to ask Bush to sign PRO IP Bill into law (Techdirt) (Techdirt) (Public… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
The Committee has called for limits on the liability of accounting firms, targeting of individual executives rather than firms for prosecution, and the scaling back of shareholder lawsuits. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
While, technically, the interim rule does not impose any new requirement on U.S. businesses, because all are already required to comply with U.S. export requirements, the interim rule does impose additional risks and liabilities on defense contractors because a violation of U.S. export laws could now also result in a breach of contract. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
Corporate-owned companies like the National Arbitration Forum prostitute justice by limiting the liability of Big Business to insure that corporate dirty linen stays out of public courtrooms, hidden in the dark world of back room deals called mandatory arbitration. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:15 pm
Authored by: John W. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:38 am
So where does this leave me? [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Best Buy Company, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
” Of course, the $8.5 million insurance settlement increment could be argued to represent some cash to the company, but the ratio of the benefit to the corporation versus the benefit to plaintiffs’ counsel does not favor the settlement. [read post]
