Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 601 - 620
of 10,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
How then does all of this work practically? [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 8:33 am
Bradley's shenanigans have alienated just about everybody who's witnessed them.UPDATE (2/28): The Houston Chronicle editorialized today that the Senate should reject John Bradley's nomination. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Does 1-1017, 2:2011cv02068 (C.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:50 am
What does it connote? [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
As observant IPKat readers may have noticed, there has been a flurry of activity at the UK Patent Office in recent months regarding 'excluded' subject matter under section 1(2) of the Patents Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
In re South Park Cigar, Inc., Serial No. 78486382 (February 1, 2007).In a well-reasoned and careful opinion, the Board began by pointing out that, under the CAFC's California Innovations decision, the proper basis for refusal of a geographically deceptive mark is not Section 2(a) but Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:58 pm
In John Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:34 am
"And so the Board reversed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:33 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
See Dkt 86, at 1:28- 2:2 (“it appears that these persons, and their related entities, may have defrauded the Court through their acts and representations in these cases. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78487208 (October 31, 2007) [precedential].Section 1(b)(2) requires that an application "include specification ... of the goods. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
John G. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:45 pm
2. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
While more accurate than John Simpson's earlier inaccurate ramblings on the re-examof the WARF patents, IPBiz adds some text. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:04 am
” The “scandalous” prong of Section 2(a) has barred registration of vulgar marks like 1-800-JACK-OFF, MOMSBANGTEENS, SEX ROD, and BULLSHIT, to name a few. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:27 am
§3142(e)(2). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:02 pm
Here’s what Brian had to say: 1. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:12 pm
John J. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:59 pm
What does it take be a great trial lawyer, anyway? [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
"Hang down your head John Whealan. [read post]
