Search for: "John W. Brown" Results 601 - 620 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
John Hoveton [2024] ECC Nor 2] [Top of section] [Top of post] Some information about the church and some photographs can be found at: https://www.britainexpress.com/counties/norfolk/churches/hoveton-st-john.htm Exhumation Other Re St. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Sandy Levinson
  Perhaps John Brown was right that the country needed to be purified by blood sacrifice, as Lincoln himself seemed to suggest in his Second Inaugural. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
" … [W]e reverse the district court "only if it plainly appears that the court below committed a meaningful error of judgment. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
A Paradigm Shift in the Cost-Benefit State Tuesday, April 26, 2016  | John D. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Vladeck
But whereas each of these denials came without any explanation, Bickel’s shadow hovers over the three opinions that the Justices have provided explaining their decisions not to decide high-profile detainee cases: First, in April 2006, Justice Anthony Kennedy penned a concurrence in the denial of certiorari joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice John Paul Stevens (the only opinion featuring that line-up in the five Terms during which the trio served together) in… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The first High Court hearing in Lord McAlpine’s defamation claim against Sally Bercow will take place on Tuesday, as the Guardian reports here. 25 Bedford Row reports that John Cooper QC, instructed by Pinder Reaux, has obtained a “six figure settlement” for the actress Lynda Bellingham over online statements made online about the Claimant and her husband. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
John Henry Wigmore’s classic formulation of the privilege was adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1927.[11] It continues to remain the touchstone or the framework for privilege analysis in Canada. [read post]