Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules" Results 601 - 620 of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 7:16 am by Kenneth Propp
That ruling found that U.S. surveillance law offered insufficient judicial protection for Europeans who suspected the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
  It states:"The Subcommittee is aware of and has discussed the fact that judgments may originate from countries with lesser standards of judicial integrity and therefore be obtained under questionable circumstances. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Applying a deferential standard meant that the appellate court could not rule, as a matter of law, that the City’s interpretation of its own plan was completely misdirected. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
Removes the Governor’s power to ask the judicial qualifications commission for all information investigations/complaints against judges. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by J.S. Nelson
Within days of the West Virginia ruling, Republican state attorneys general also threatened legal action against the federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its proposed climate change rules, and twenty-four state officials submitted comments to the SEC alleging that the agency lacked power to enact regulation on climate change under the major questions doctrine. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  I knew that when I chose Hughes as my judicial expositor of Dicey’s rule of law, 1937 came with him. [read post]
In parallel to the EP’s vote on the AI Report, in April 2021, the European Commission proposed a Regulation laying down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (“AI Regulation”) (see our previous blog post here). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
It is recognized that in some years a lawyer may render greater or fewer hours than the annual standard specified, but during the course of his or her legal career, each lawyer should render on average per year, the number of hours set forth in this Rule. [read post]
Hobby Lobby wins its case if the government fails on either prong of this rigorous standard of review. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
Friot remanded the matter back to the commission.Dillard's is asking the commission to send the case back into the federal judicial system, filing a motion asserting that it doesn't have jurisdiction due to federal preemption, because its plan is not SOLELY for the purpose of workers' compensation but covers non-industrial benefits too.The case won't end at the commission. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
If passed, the rule would standardize differing requirements for negative option contracts offered via telephone, internet, print, and in-person. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:01 am by Vikram Raghavan
The Election Commission observed the sixtieth year of its existence on Monday. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am by Peter Swire
The multiple other provisions in the Privacy Shield did not face any negative judicial finding. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to the California statutory business judgment rule, the court observed that the statute provides that directors who perform their duties as directors in accordance with the statutory standards have no liability for failing to properly discharge their duties as such. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court’s Ruling The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Commission’s position that its conciliation activities are beyond judicial review. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 Rather, it shows that military commissions are in many respects modeled after the federal criminal justice system, and diverge based on principled departures consistent with the rule of law. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
These problems will arise when agencies or courts reach “major” results by applying flexible judicial standards. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
  Paragraph 34 states:“The EU will … c) Raise awareness among judges, law enforcement officials, staff of human rights commissions and policymakers around the world of the need to promote international standards, including standards protecting intermediaries from the obligation of blocking Internet content without prior due process. [read post]