Search for: "Kelly v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In April 2011, the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
The Mirena IUD was first marketed in the United States in 2000. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Kelly Goudschaal and Marci Frazier jointly decided to have children. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
This Kat has long admired the crisp, clean lines of some of Apple's larger stores in the United States, but he had no idea until recently that, behind that smooth, elegant format, there lurked a layer of IP protection. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
United States (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:41 pm
App. 1993); see also United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm
" Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
As I noted in my introduction, I want to focus on one aspect of the medical marijuana laws: those relating to the sale of medical marijuana, which involves a little something the United States is normally quite fond of – capitalism. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
