Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 601 - 620 of 625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2007, 4:54 pm
I still haven't yet had a chance to read all the SCOTUS death decisions today, but I notice that many thoughtful bloggers are all over these cases: Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences discusses all the cases here and here. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
  The oral argument transcript is available at this link, and Kent Scheidegger has an analysis of some of the issues that arose during argument in this post at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:10 pm
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has this analysis of Panetti and this post about its relationship to the Court's 1975 decision in Faretta v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences gathers the supplemental briefs in Panetti v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:48 am
See Kent Scheidegger's interesting post on the Crime &Consequences blog at http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/2007/04/muddying_the_water_on_judicial.html [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has this post on the Court's denial of certiorari in the Guantanamo detainee cases, Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 2:36 pm
Kent Scheidegger reports here at Crime & Consequences that bottom-side briefs were filed yesterday in Panetti v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 4:16 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences has some commentary on these vetoes here. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:34 pm
Doug Berman, Rick Garnett, and Kent Scheidegger have all been blogging a bit about yesterday's 14-1 en banc Ninth Circuit decision upholding a competent defendant's right to waive further death penalty appeals. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:07 pm
   In the comments on Sentencing Law & Policy, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences quotes the United States Supreme Court opinion in Coker to argue that the Coker decision only applied to the death penalty for the rape of an adult woman. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences has this post on the medicinal marijuana Raich case, which was redecided by the Ninth Circuit today almost two years after being remanded by the Court. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences reports here on the Court's decision to grant certiorari in Watson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Here, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences discusses Fry v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:21 pm
Finally, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences has this post on the Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 12:15 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger points to what he believes is a "Cunningham Catch-22" here. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:18 pm
Kent Scheidegger also has this post on today's ruling at the Crime and Consequences blog. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 1:31 am
" "Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, disagrees that the decline will last. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, disagrees that the decline will last. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 10:54 am
"If the governor says this is a high priority, it's going to get the attention it needs from top-level officials,'' said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation and a supporter of capital punishment. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:00 pm
Russell (06-5306), testing whether a federal appeals court may dismiss as too late an appeal that a District Court had authorized, out of the usual time limits but after the District Court had reopened the appeal time.Helpfully, Kent Scheidegger provides links to the circuit rulings being reviewed here. [read post]