Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:26 pm
[A new filing in Vega v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm
Just to pick one example, in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:30 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
In a 2006 decision in State of Utah v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
See Lopez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:46 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
Listed this morning for half a day in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Reed, L Toulson and L Hodge. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:25 am
[United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
United States, 425 U.S. at 394–95, 96 S. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
See DePriest v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:35 am
Kansas don’t need no stinkin’ rule, and in Kahler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
United States On June 5, 2017, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition to hear a major Fourth Amendment case decided by the Sixth Circuit, Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
