Search for: "King v. American Power" Results 601 - 620 of 873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2021, 2:23 pm by David Kopel
As for what the meaning might have been in the 1300s or 1400s, the edicts of tyrannical kings do not define the scope of American rights centuries later. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
The Conglomerate takes a jab at the first sentence of the Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Larceny, defined to be the theft of effects, personal property, or money, exceeding in value one hundred and fifty American Dollars or forty Iraq Dinars. 18. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The German parliament has passed a bill that awards extensive surveillance powers to law enforcement authorities. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) has published a report assessing the human rights impact of the Investigatory Powers Bill which gives it cautious approval. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Dorsen: I made that arrangement with the firm Wallace King, which Sedgwick absorbed as its Washington office. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Among 18-29-year-old Americans, 20 percent said they vaped.[5] However, vapor products are not the only harm-reducing nicotine product widely available on the American nicotine market. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The CJEU’s recent decision in the Tele2/Watson case may call the viability of the new Investigatory Powers Act into question. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
    King Duncan:       Is execution done on Cawdor? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:25 am by Adam Klasfeld
”  Those prospects aside, for Sotomayor, the majority has left virtually no constraints in the criminal code for how a president can exploit the trappings of that office: “In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law. [read post]