Search for: "King v. United States Government"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Because the United States continues to enforce the ACA (as its own brief noted), there is still a case or controversy, as there was in Windsor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:46 am
United States urging the Supreme Court to end the exception for good. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am
“Even where the Government declines to intervene, ‘the United States is the real party in interest in any [FCA] suit. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Back in January, we put up a short post noting the filing of a petition for extraordinary ("King's Bench") review in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm
”SLAM argues that federal agents cannot take the mask because the government cannot produce sufficient information to show that the mask was stolen or smuggled into the United States pursuant to 19 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
[T]his interest is implicated even when the suit is brought indirectly — against a civilian contractor — rather than directly against the United States itself. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court in Quality King v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
As gay, lesbian, and other proponents of same-sex marriages celebrate the United States Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Government Ordered to Respond to Restitution Issues in Fraud Case Against Newspapers' Workers
United States v. [read post]
