Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 7:06 pm
The Supreme Court in Comcast v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:21 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
The Monterey County Superior Court invalidated the measure, concluding that it was preempted by contrary, longstanding state law. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:44 am
Most readers are probably not old enough to remember the demand, largely but not entirely from segregationists unhappy with Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Superior Court, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a non-resident defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction in a state in virtue of having been served with process while physically present within the state, even apart from any other contacts the defendant has or doesn't have with the forum state. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
As an aside, Judge Kennedy is the first judge before whom I did a civil jury trial, in 1997 in the District of Columbia Superior Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Garrett v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) is pending in the Cal. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:08 pm
Segal v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
Billington, another such case in Los Angeles Superior Court, but the court there dismissed the claim on substantive grounds and didn't reach the pseudonymity question; and the defendant in any event identified the plaintiff in court filings—the plaintiff hadn't gotten leave to proceed pseudonymously, and there was certainly no court order limiting how the defendant could refer to the plaintiff—so the matter became largely… [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
Superior Court of Butte County, 2010 Cal. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:08 pm
As a result of the Supreme Court's decision eBay Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
Superior Court of L.a. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 6:00 pm
v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mireles v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
The court rejected the insured's argument that such exclusions do not apply to "one-time, negligent" discharges or should be limited to "catastrophic events such as large scale industrial pollution The court also held that the fact that the sewer in question was sealed merely limited the scope of injury and did not alter the fact that there had been a release into the environment.. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:44 am
The Court's finding was based largely on its interview of D.A. [read post]
