Search for: "Law v. Phillips"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Idaho Nov. 1, 2010); Phillips v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
Defamation law in urgent need of reform, mainstream media actions on the up, social media actions become a trend, suppression orders continue unabated, journalist shield laws appear to be working … Media lawyers Peter Bartlett and Sam White look at the past year A Uniform Defamation Law came into operation in 2005 after some 30 years of lobbying. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Phillips serves as litigation counsel for the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public interest law firm dedicated to election integrity. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
Phillips, Counsel for Cosgrove Law Group, LLC and former Director of Enforcement for the Missouri Securities Division, Office of the Secretary of State. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
In this case the judge found that the supporting facts were true and verified as such (Lord Phillips at [87] and Lord Mance at [167]). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:41 am
For example, Joshua Phillips is serving a life sentence without parole. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
The Conscious Uncoupling of UK and EU Intellectual Property Law," will be hosted in-person at UCL and live streamed.The speakers include Dr Ruth Fox (Director of the Hansard Society), Professor Phillip Johnson (University of Cardiff) and Nina O’Sullivan (Mishcon de Reya LLP). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:06 am
Papelino v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:47 pm
The problem is that Graham v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
Listen to the podcast *** Brodie Clark’s tribunal claim – and Parliamentary privilege Carl Gardner analyses – in great detail – the Parliamentary privilege point we discussed in the podcast – a good read. *** In association with The Lawyer I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw, Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School, David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors, Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
Canada The Canadian government has introduced a bill to bring an Australia-style news media bargaining code into law. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
The following cases, both pre-Owens and post-768.0755, are examples of how the law is applied. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
”73 73 Phillips v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 2:40 am
The third and fourth hearings listed below will be held at the University of San Diego School of Law, Warren Hall, Grace Courtroom, San Diego, CA. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 12:58 pm
Yes, Phillips v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Spagone (which was dismissed upon motion of the United States), and the cases that have been dismissed as improvidently granted (Phillip Morris v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:32 am
PhillipsIn Susan Orillion v. [read post]