Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 601 - 620 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2007, 2:34 pm
In the USA Today, Joan Biskupic has this preview of Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
Let's take another look at yesterday's defense motion in USA v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
  There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Home Depot USA, 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014)) (discussed in this blog post). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:41 pm by Francis Pileggi
Invoking the principles articulated in USA Cafes, the Court of Chancery recently held that a controller cannot use its control over an entity to advantage himself at the expense of the controlled entity. 77 Charters, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:13 pm by Sme
USA Swimming (10th Cir., January 2, 2018) (affirming dismissal of Pliuskaitis’s damages claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction: he failed to challenge the arbitrator's denial of damages)Discrimination/Retaliation*Black v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:31 pm by Sme
SKF USA, Inc. (10th Cir., August 1,2018) (affirming final judgment against him on his hostile-work-environment claims: there is no basis for reversal)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Otero v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm by The Docket Navigator
[T]he Federal Circuit had implicitly upheld the use of the 25 percent rule prior to [Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
This is the classic "brother's keeper" v. individual rights issue. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]