Search for: "Lay v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 6,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
The en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime... [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:29 am
iStock_000000215912XSmall.jpg Witness testimony that the defendant made a telephone threat to his girlfriend was inadmissible hearsay; the government could not rely on the statement alone to meet its burden to establish the foundation to show that the girlfriend was making a statement as an agent of the defendant, under FRE 801(d)(2)(D), or made an authorized party statement, under FRE 801(d)(2)(C); error in admitting the statement was harmless, in United States… [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:07 am
Circuit Judge O’Malley filed a dissenting opinion (Biogen International GmbH v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 2:25 am
Case date: 01 February 2022 Case number: No. 20-1558 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:36 pm
In the recent decision, Gent v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:02 pm
The Supreme Court has never ruled directly on whether Congress acted unconstitutionally in laying down a standard in AEDPA for federal court review in habeas cases of state criminal convictions and sentences. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
or is a matter of common sense, apparent to any lay person . . . [read post]
5 May 2018, 5:31 pm
Turman, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
No Florida Appellate court had spoken squarely to this issue until Plaza Court, and their opinion should finally lay the issue to rest in the state of Florida. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:12 am
The Appellate Division addressed the problems with lay testimony in 1973’s State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:34 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:55 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court, in Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Justice Sotomayor stumbles at page 16, line 2, after raising a principle of statutory interpretation from last year's Bond case (the chemicals-on-the-doorknob case, where the Court read a federal statute not to criminalize a matter that lay within the traditional powers of the state). [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:35 am
Guiracocha v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
