Search for: "Light v. Light" Results 601 - 620 of 41,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:49 pm by Donald Dinnie
MEC for the Department of Health Free State Province v G.A.K obo M.A.K (2795/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 142 (25 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:54 pm
He also knew the 277-volt power circuit was turned on to power the building’s lights, as the mandatory temporary lighting had been removed the prior day. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
In the post ZXC v Bloomberg era, the reasoning behind the Department of Justice’s decision to create a criminal offence to protect the same interests, and to extend its applicability to a quarter of a century after death, remains opaque. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And like heat and water, antennas and gas and light To our homes they will pipe freedom, because you had spoken of this. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am by Jocelyn Bosse
 Guest UPCKats, Agathe Michel-de Cazotte and Hiske Roos (Carpmaels), examined the need for sufficient certainty on validity and infringement, which was considered in another decision during the 10x Genomics v NanoString litigation. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
This article considers the position as to proof of foreign law in the English courts in light of the case of FS Nile Plaza v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 and the 11th edition of the Commercial Court Guide. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:49 pm
The article thus sheds light on how the proportionality principle is applied in the context of Korean constitutional jurisprudence and the resultant deprivation of protection for certain fundamental rights in Korea. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Citing its predecessor court’s seminal case of Radium Mines, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm by Brett Trout
 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC that the Rosen-Durling test is out and the tried and true Graham v. [read post]