Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 11,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 2:50 am by Michael DelSignore
  The Massachusetts Declaration of Human Rights and the United States Constitution protect citizens from unreasonable seizures. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Greenwood, --- S.Ct. ----, 2012 WL 43514 (1/10/12) the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) considered whether the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
On November 14, 2012, the Yale Supreme Court Clinic, in conjunction with my office, filed a certiorari petition with the United States Supreme Court, asking that the case be heard in light of disagreements among the federal circuit courts about whether the First Amendment prevents public supervisors from disciplining or terminating employees in retaliation for their good faith courtroom testimony. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:02 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Burwell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm by Kyle Green
After the October 6, 2014 argument in front of the United States Supreme Court, attorneys for Nicholas Heien and the attorneys for the state of North Carolina finally received a decision on December 15, 2014 for the Heien v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
This assertion invites the reader to critique in new light the Court’s decisions regarding the administrative state since J.W. [read post]