Search for: "Long v. Murphy"
Results 601 - 620
of 766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
DOI: http://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.205 [7] Amateur Sports Act of 1978.,95 P.L. 606, 92 Stat. 3045 [8] San Francisco Arts & Ath., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:27 am
’”[v] And the thread goes on. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:48 pm
On May 21, 2018, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm
The film's voice cast features famous actors including Mandy Moore, Zachary Levi and Donna Murphy. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 7:56 pm
In 2018, the NCAA (along with the Trump administration and various professional sports leagues) was on the losing side in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
In Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am
Murphy and James Staab, there are no fewer than four new or forthcoming books on the justice: David M. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Critics argue that the EPA has defined the term far too broadly, to include not just traditional navigable waters but more and more isolated, insignificant water bodies or even dry erosional features caused by long-past water flow, interfering with development and infringing on states’ traditional regulation of land use. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
Judge Murphy concurred in result only, expressing the view that the majority improperly equated removal and confinement when analyzing the defendant’s motion to dismiss the kidnapping charge. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, recently reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
The only reason removal is even possible prior to service is due to the advent of electronic case filing and waiver of service rules that could not have been foreseen when the current removal statute was enacted.Id. at *6 (discussing and attempting to analogize to Murphy Brothers, Inc., v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:24 am
I was discussing the Fourth Circuit case of Porter v. [read post]
