Search for: "Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xiii] And on Sept. 21, the United Kingdom’s Law Commission announced the start of “two new projects to ensure that English law can accommodate two emerging technologies that could [revolutionize] commerce: smart contracts and digital assets. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the store chain in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Nicolas P. Terry
These include so-called “take-home” lawsuits where the plaintiff is not the employee (typically barred by workers compensation laws), but a relative (a claim approved by a California appellate court in See’s Candies, Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by assoulineberlowe
In response, A&B argued that Keegan had benefited Callado and the property by providing the foreclosure defense services, no different than a material man provides a benefit under the construction lien statute. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:19 am by John Elwood
When the current justices’ papers are released, long after we’re all dead, perhaps our descendants will be able to figure out what happened. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
June 17, 2019) is so similar to Johnson v Ramirez that there is no point in providing details. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax likely violates federal law by imposing discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce and faces serious challenges under the Dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
Having decided two maritime-law cases during its October 2018 term, the Supreme Court will consider its third admiralty case in just over a year when it hears argument in CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]