Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 3:04 am
Lord Hughes gave the only judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
As Lord Hope stated at [31]: The principle of proportionality requires that the means employed to achieve an aim recognised by Community law as legitimate correspond to the importance of that aim and are necessary for its achievement. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the dissenting judgment, with which Lord Reed agreed: they would both have allowed the appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
"Lord Justice Rimer and Lord Justice Elias gave consenting judgments. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Lord Mance stated that “in matters of statutory construction, the statutory purpose and general scheme by which it is to be put into effect are of central importance. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
On 20 July 2012 there will be an application in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
The Court of Appeal decision The lead judgment, with which Lord Justices Phillips and Moylan agreed, was given by Lord Justice Males. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Lord Burrows stated the illegitimacy of the threat would have been determined with reference to the justification for the demand. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:51 am
Relying on Rowinski v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Gelfuso v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Global Aerospace v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:53 am
Do laws that constrain state agents on state territory also apply abroad? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
