Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 601 - 620
of 53,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
In this decision the Enlarged Board (EBA) deals with a complaint against Board 3.4.02’s decision to revoke the opposed patent (T 2030/07). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
The ED and the Board both came to the conclusion that the claimed subject-matter did not involve an inventive step. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
The 10% matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 6:45 am
The other piece is the inability to upload documents into the system (or at least I couldn't see it in the online demo). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
This follows from the consideration that - in accordance with R 43(1) – the invention in the European patent application is defined by the subject-matter of a claim, i.e. the specific combination of features present in the claim, as is reminded in opinion G 2/98 [2] of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
It has been established by the case law of the Boards of appeal (6th edition, 2010, VI.D.4.1.3a) that the addition of a dependent claim cannot possibly be a response to an objection that the claimed subject-matter (the process of claim 1) is not patentable because it neither limits nor amends the subject-matter claimed in the relevant independent claim (claim 1). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the original disclosure does not even expressly refer to these different categories of SFCs. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
The patent proprietor criticized this approach and cited T 737/92, which had stated, in point [2.2] of its reasons:… The legal framework of any opposition case is uniquely defined by (i) the extent to which a patent is actually opposed and (ii) the grounds (in the sense of A 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC [1973]) upon which it is opposed, whilst its factual framework is determined by the facts, evidence and arguments adduced and set out in the Notice of Opposition pursuant to R… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Most disputes don’t really matter in your life. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings (OPs) the ED informed the applicant that the claims were not acceptable under R 137(3). [read post]
30 May 2009, 6:52 pm
O’ROURKE: “The fate of Detroit isn't a matter of economics. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Listen to Experts in Estate Matters. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
T 666/90, T 552/97 and T 1439/05), the fact that the final requests were not established contravenes the provisions of Article 113(2) EPC and is considered a substantial procedural violation. [3] The substantial procedural violation requires that the decision under appeal be set aside and justifies the reimbursement of the appeal fee according to R 67 EPC 1973 (applicable here, see J 10/07 [7]). [read post]
24 May 2020, 8:36 am
Comm’r, 908 F.3d 1094 (7th Cir. 2018) (a) Facts: Husband and wife filed a joint tax return for 2004. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Unfortunately, it wasn’t as easy as I would have liked. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
None of these measures get to the root of the matter. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:18 am
Crowe (R-Slidell) and Julie Quinn (R-Metairie) ended up hosting two town hall meetings due to larger, unexpected crowds. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
DAVID BERNSTEIN: “I’d like to thank Media Matters for illustrating my point. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In particular it provided information about whether the subject matter of the patent was inventive and/or sufficiently disclosed. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 12:57 pm
Charlotte Divorce Attorney Matthew R. [read post]
