Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 601 - 620
of 120,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
Here: US v Samish Cert Petition Samish–Pet App (final) Questions presented: 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
See Bridgeman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:37 pm
See Nelson v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:16 pm
The post on May 29, 2010 described how the Ohio Department of Health purchased 700 Intoxilyzer 8000 breath testing machines and is implementing use of the machines throughout Ohio. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:07 am
L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others [2010] EWCA Civ 535; [2010] WLR (D) 134 “The effect of the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European in L’Oréal SA v Bellure NVs (Case C-487/07) [2010] Bus LR 303 was that the use of comparative lists, whereby traders of smell-alike perfume products cited, for marketing purposes, the products in the market to which their own products smelt similar, was unlawful. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:02 am
Spears v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
The analysis highlights the potential pitfalls of using unverified AI for legal pleadings and emphasizes the need for caution among attorneys.Misuse of AI in Grant v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Or some analysts’ notes may be written simply as reminders to self. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:15 am
In Prairie Valley Baptist Church v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am
"].May 16, 2012 - 2 PM: Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
Using a global positioning device to track the location of individuals while at workPeople v Weaver, 2009 NY Slip Op 03762, Decided on May 12, 2009, Court of AppealsA number disciplinary actions taken against employees were initiated by, or relied upon, the use of global positioning equipment installed in the employer's vehicle or in the employer-issued cell phone. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
Although the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, when enacted, was concerned with corporate fraud, the Yates case reflects that it may be used to sweep in all kinds of trivial forms of noncompliance--and subject an individual to felony prosecution. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:12 am
US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
AMREP Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:35 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Guam v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:10 pm
Nevertheless, various types of copyrighted works important to hotel operators may well be affected by the Court’s fair use analysis. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
This article was published in the March 31, 2022 edition of the Pennyslvania Law Weekly and is republished here with permission.The Regular Use Exclusion May Not be So Regular AnymoreBy Daniel E. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:59 am
2015 may set a record low in published South Carolina family law opinions. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
The US Supreme Court announced Monday it will take up the trademark case Vidal v. [read post]
