Search for: "MONEY v. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 22,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 8:40 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Since the early 1900’s, the federal mail and wire fraud statutes have been applied to schemes to defraud victims not just of money or property, but also of “intangible rights” such as the right to the “honest services” of an... [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:22 am by Peter
Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute writes in All of Your Money Belongs to the State that the 9th circuit thinks just that: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in an appeal of a 9th Circuit decision, Winn v Garriott, a challenge to one of Arizona’s education tax credit programs. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
Texas [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that states do not consent to waive their sovereign immunity to private suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) [42 USC § 2000cc, text]. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Montana [official website] on Friday ruled [decision, PDF] that its state's November ballots may include Initiative 166 [text, PDF], a nonbinding policy statement that would direct the state's congress to support an amendment to the US Constitution [text] asserting that corporations are not people and money does not qualify as speech. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
Much of that money then goes to fund extensive lobbying. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:35 am
Defendants are four Chinese nationals who embezzle a huge -- and I mean, huge -- amount of money from the Bank of China. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:37 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
This concentration of wealth and financial expertise has enticed many out-of-state investors to place their money in securities with New York-based financial institutions in the prospect of riches; however, coupled with the influx of these out-of-state investments is the potential for legal action by each dissatisfied or defrauded investor. [read post]