Search for: "MURPHY v. UNITED STATES" Results 601 - 620 of 1,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
 The United States Supreme Court has held that certain categories of speech do not receive constitutional protection. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States, which was argued less than a month before the election, on October 11, 1944. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Mark Ashton
This is itself an interesting question in a world where the General Assembly has stated that marriage can only involve a man and woman but the federal court has ruled that this legal distinction is not legally permissible under the United State Constitution. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:47 am
Russia (I) Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawDavid P. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Nor was he permitted to compare his situation to that of others who had received the discretionary relief he said he would plausibly have also received; that mode of analysis is off the table after United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
United States Jim Belushi has filed a defamation suit and is seeking more than $50,000 in damages against Sahar Chavoshi, general manager of The Comedy Bar. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
United States The Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that the state’s criminal libel law which allows for punishment of up to one year imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for libellous statements is unconstitutionally overboard. [read post]