Search for: "Marbury v. Marbury" Results 601 - 620 of 904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am by Charles Sartain
 37, p. 276 if you’re interested) and decisions as early as Marbury v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am by SHG
We have a tri-partite government, with a legislative branch to enact laws, an executive branch to implement the laws enacted by the legislative branch, and a judicial branch, the “least dangerous branch,” to resolve disputes and, because of Marbury v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:35 am by Jeff Gamso
QUEENER: Well -       JUSTICE SCALIA: -- because there really isn't any perfect remedy.In 1803, in Marbury v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm by David Bernstein
I think that judicial review is implicit in the Constitution, for the reasons stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am by Dale Carpenter
As Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Those disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision in the ACA cases have searched for a silver lining in an otherwise devastating defeat: five justices would prohibit the Commerce power from reaching inaction, a Machiavellian CJ Roberts took the long view, that this is the Chief's Marbury v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:29 am by Dale Carpenter
(For now, let's leave aside the status of so-called "super-precedents" like Marbury v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by John Jascob
Just as innovators have sandboxes in which to develop new technologies, Congress should give regulators a sandbox for applying them.The SEC’s July report concluding that DAO tokens were securities is the agency’s digital Marbury v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Board complied with the court's directive and the Plaintiff appealed the court's ruling to the Appellate Division.Citing Marbury v Madison , 1 Cranch [5 US] 137, the Appellate Division explained that a legislative body may not usurp a court's power to interpret and apply the law to the particular circumstances before it and it is beyond the authority of the County Legislature to determine that the Board's decision to withhold the Plaintiff's… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]