Search for: "Marin v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 10:12 am
Wing Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:18 am
The lawsuit, United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:59 am
Grays Hill Baptist Church v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States held in Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:37 am
See Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Apex Marine, 498 U.S. 19 (1990). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Apex Marine, 498 U.S. 19 (1990). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Apex Marine, 498 U.S. 19 (1990). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
The wreck was discovered by Intersal, Inc., a marine salvage company, on November 21, 1996, almost 278 years to the day after Blackbeard’s death. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Sand Dollar Marine, Inc., 805 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1986); Continue reading [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
“[A] debtor’s failure to list a legal claim as an asset in his or her bankruptcy proceeding causes the claim to remain the property of the bankruptcy estate and precludes the debtor from pursuing the claim on his or her own behalf” (123 Cutting Co. v Topcove Assoc., 2 AD3d 606, 607; see 11 USC § 554; Ladson v Fessel, 85 AD3d 1128, 1129; see also Dynamics Corp. of Am. v Marine Midland Bank-N.Y., 69 NY2d 191, 195-196). [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:26 am
Facts: This case (Schmidt v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:00 am
Barron v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:00 am
Barron v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm
“Pursuant to CPLR 4111 (c), when the answers on a verdict sheet ‘are inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall require the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or it shall order a new trial,’” wrote the panel, quoting Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
