Search for: "Mark A. Smith"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2021, 9:15 am
March 16, 2013 marked a watershed date in the practice of patent law as the effective date of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:38 am
Macalister-Smith & J. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 3:55 pm
The phrase puff piece wasn't much used back when Summers was credited with saving the world from an economic meltdown on the cover of Time magazine in 1999, Mark Paul, an economics professor at New College of Florida, tells Axios. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:13 am
Tracy Smith on Billy Crystal. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:19 am
Smith-Baltiher, 424 F.3D 913 (9th Cir. 2005). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:58 pm
Harvard Law's John Goldberg and Henry Smith have started a new blog, New Private Law, which already has included a number of posts that might be of interest.Janet Freilich noted U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
See the comment below, but don't peek.]In re Smith & Vandiver Corp., Serial No. 77492026 (November 29, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
A merger, or bankruptcy, would mark a striking turn for a firm that became one of the largest in New York five years ago with the linkup of two storied firms. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:37 am
So I was wrong. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:57 am
Mark Phillips on the sandwich. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
Smith? [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:03 am
Smith? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:25 am
Bose, 91 USPQ2d at 1939 (quoting Smith Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:51 am
., that it was an unpublished decision that was marked non-precedential. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
In the end, the Court decided to leave Smith on the books for now. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:39 pm
" So my words of advice to Mark & Jim? [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:30 am
The Plaintiffs hired Mark W. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
.* Not Kool: EU General Court decides on the DINKOOL trade markJani has often pondered whether the mere use of a part of a trade mark, or the inclusion of a mark in a new variant of a name, could prevent the registration of a new mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:18 am
That's the title of Jordan Smith's article in the latest Austin Chronicle. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
Smith v. [read post]
