Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 601 - 620
of 70,920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
In Case T? [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
She litigates patent infringement cases on behalf of both patent owners and those accused of infringing patents. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:38 am
Ask Mark Leech... [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
The court also held that the United States had a right to intervene in the patent marking case. [read post]
24 May 2009, 8:54 am
A similar case came before Mr Justice Anold in L'Oreal SA and [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:43 am
The Federal Circuit remanded the case back to the Board to “resolve factual disputes between the parties over whether Boeing’s legend does or does not restrict the government’s rights. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm
Tags: patent marking Related posts September 7 roundup (8) Patents: “Senate Proposes to End False Marking Onslaught” (1) Open season for “false marking” bounty-hunters? [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:18 pm
Pryatel, Case no. 2015-1005 Cuyahoga County The Board of Professional Conduct has concluded that Cleveland attorney Mark... [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:13 pm
Professor Bainbridge offers a very detailed analysis of the complaint in the SEC’s case against Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
The UK IPO has issued a new Practice Notice (PAN 01/09) concerning acceptable trade mark specifications for the provision of shopping centre services. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:00 pm
[Digressing: This Leo must have found what looks like interesting Indian case law relating to tax and exploitation of IP rights here and here] Source: hereLastly, he succumbed to the temptation of searching for ‘Hollywood’ only to find over 300 results, again comprising of various marks (especially word combinations) in different classes both expired and registered, including ‘HOLLYWOOD’ – a mark once owned by Hollywood… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:21 am
(FINRA Case #2015044509301) Mark Schklar (CRD #1952816, Eagleville, Tennessee) submitted an AWC (Accept, Waiver & Consent) in which he was assessed a deferred fine of $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for eight months. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am
Defendant's motion to stay plaintiff's qui tam false marking case pending the Federal Circuit's resolution of Stauffer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:03 am
The case is In re Alessandro Suuberg, U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
Kat friends Beatrice Wee and Hong Qibin examine the case of Burberry Ltd v Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd , in which the Singapore Court of Appeal held that as far as a freight forwarder was concerned, an alleged infringer is only liable for trade mark infringement under section 27 of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”) if it had knowledge or reason to believe that a sign had been affixed on the goods in question. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:32 am
The challenge by the Prince of Hanover to the decision of the First Board of Appeal upholding the examiner's decision to dismiss the Prince's application to register his family coat of arms as a trade mark is a peach of a case. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 5:38 am
It’s not clear whether Schiller is referring to the use of a lower-case first letter or the entire mark, but the question still stands: is “watchOS” truly an ownable mark? [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit released its judgment which upheld an original ruling in a trademark infringement case between Maker's Mark and Jose Cuervo International that dates back to 2003. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm
"However, the parties' clothing products and gym bags were identical, and opposers' carrying cases for game consoles were similar to Applicant's school bags and the like. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:21 pm
Based on this case, it is important to make a determination of whether a product is covered by a patent or not before marking the product with a patent number and before paying royalties. [read post]
