Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
The below is China’s White Paper on the US-China trade dispute, as put out by China’s State Council Information Office. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Moreover, there are ample arguments California agencies wishing to defend their chalking practices may make to convince state and federal courts in the Ninth Circuit not to follow the Sixth Circuit’s flawed decision. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
How time flies! [read post]
18 May 2019, 11:57 am
This year marks one hundred years since the birth of modern First Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:01 pm
If he expects privacy, he is engaging in wishful thinking. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
Law Review (1960) QUESTION: This year marks the 100th anniversary of the first Supreme Court decisions interpreting the freedoms of speech and the press. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
Furthermore, the public perceives a mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse its various details (C-342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik).The Board then went on to note that registration of a trade mark which consists of indications that are also used as advertising slogans are not precluded from registration per se. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
Erica VaccarelloBy the end of June, the US Supreme Court will have ruled on the registrability of scandalous and immoral marks in Iancu (USPTO) v Brunetti (No. 18-302). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
In the case of Butta v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Patel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
See Ybarra v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
(Continuing with India as example, there are no resources under X, Y, Z or # – but V has Venkateswaran on Trade Marks And Passing-Off & Vithalbhai B Patel : Law on Industrial Disputes) When you have a source that you wish to read highlighted in the left hand column – then the right hand column offers a search within the source or a hyperlinked table of contents for books or lists of years for other sources meaning you can drill down to particular content. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
