Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
Case date: 22 July 2022 Case number: No. 21-2786 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am
’s well-settled status in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Mark J. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
First, the real plaintiff was the United States, not Simonian. [read post]
CA3: Police were objectively reasonable in entering a house they thought was abandoned but it wasn't
8 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co LP v APCC Services Inc divided on the question whether an assignee for collection of federal debts satisfied Article III standing. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889), also known as the Chinese Exclusion Case. [read post]
8 May 2025, 4:26 am
The court also upheld the Board’s finding that APR had effectively conceded a likelihood of confusion, but concluded that Heritage could not block registration without demonstrating protectable rights in its prior marks (Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
