Search for: "Martin by and Through Martin v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 885
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
This will also allow courts, through the limited use of closed proceedings, to hear a greater range of evidence in national security cases“. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201). [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan School of Law (United States) Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law (United States) Are there any outer limits? [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
,”—and calling for “destruction of the United States,” and “the destruction of the Jewish people. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Theatre Works recording of “8” features an all-star cast led by Golden Globe Award-winner and Academy and Emmy Award-nominee Brad Pitt as United States District Chief Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Ostendorf -- Error to fail to consider whether lesser sanction would be a viable alternativeJANUARY MARTIN, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
"[Side note: Despite all the magic hand-waving by ECUSA's Presiding Bishop and its General Convention, there is one and only one way to have a diocese become a member of the association of dioceses known as the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States.The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]