Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 11:33 pm
This petition presented two questions for review: 1. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
The government has opposed granting cert in all of them. [read post]
29 Nov 2005, 7:52 pm
The idea that claim construction is solely a matter of law devoid of factual underpinnings is a farce and a fraud and should be discarded. [read post]
29 Nov 2005, 7:52 pm
The idea that claim construction is solely a matter of law devoid of factual underpinnings is a farce and a fraud and should be discarded. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
The Munich I Regional Court (Landgericht München I) is my subjective "Technology Court of the Month" (no matter how often I disagreed with it on other issues, which may happen again anytime) as it handed down two key decisions in February that have the potential to make tech law history with repercussions throughout and potentially beyond the European Union:the 21st Civil Chamber's preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice of a question… [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
As a general matter, the federal government cannot be sued for damages without its consent. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:14 pm
So here's the question. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
The cert petition summarizes the law (citations omitted): As a state agency, the Board has traditional governmental powers that private actors typically do not have: It has quasi-legislative power “to enact rules and regulations governing the practice of dentistry,” backed by criminal penalties. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Does the whole constitutional question depend on whether the bell has rung? [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:23 am
This sidesteps the more important question of whether due process requires this same ratio as matter of constitutional law. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:52 am
” Pet. for Cert. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
At IMLA’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Monday’s cert. grant in the class action case Tyson Foods v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
If cert is granted, this would be a very important case. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
Her address is probably a matter of public record as well. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:15 pm
Hunyady, 409 F.3d 297, 304 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1067 (2005). [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Three months thereafter, Brillon's fifth lawyer withdrew from the case due to a modification of his law firm's contract with the Defender General. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:28 am
The matter then is transferred to Bankruptcy Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
” After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:11 am
Carrigan, No. 10-568 (cert. granted Jan 7, 2011). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 6:22 am
" Romeril's petition to the Supreme Court presents questions mirroring his arguments before the lower courts. [read post]
