Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
One interesting question here: How, in heaven’s name, could any court (or, for that matter, any legislature) think that this scheme comports with the First Amendment? [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” It consolidated several cases involving matters like property protection, merging separate health insurance plans into a family plan, the legal rights associated with a child’s birth, inheritance tax exemption, healthcare benefits, intestacy, loss of consortium damages, workers compensation, listing both parents on birth certificate, and including a spouse’s name on a death certificate. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
Moreover, the sheer volume of cert-stage cases makes it much harder for the Court’s independent research to make up for the party’s deficiencies, though of course the very smart law clerks in the cert. pool will do their best. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
And even that one was a per curiam decision involving a procedural question on which the 6th Circuit flat-out erred, both as a matter of fact and law. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am
That you think it does, while someone else thinks religion or free expression is more important, doesn’t matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Supreme Court address the question of “Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only ’33 Act claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Supreme Court address the question of “Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only ’33 Act claims. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:04 pm
Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has such a relationship. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Or the fact that the court granted cert without a relist in the two “travel ban” cases, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
The question there is whether the 4th Amendment instead requires the higher showing needed to obtain a search warrant. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm
But context matters. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
Andrew Kent described the legal ethics questions that Kasowitz faces as a private attorney counseling the President. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers the remedy question, observing that “[w]hen the claim is that the laws are treating one group differently than the other, there are two choices: Extend the advantageous treatment to the disadvantaged group or extend the disadvantage to everyone,” “[a]nd that depends on statutory design. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 8:58 am
In its cert petition, the government presents three questions for the court to consider. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
The decision below departs from those rules, and calls into question the Executive and his authority in a way that warrants this Court’s review. [read post]
31 May 2017, 2:06 pm
The question involves the federal jurisdictional bar to Medicare challenges. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:54 am
The underlying case involved a law suit filed in state court over disclosures made in registration statements and prospectuses and involved only claims under the Securities Act without any state law claims. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Was law school already on your radar? [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm
But I don’t see how it could matter for purposes of the Fourth Amendment question of what is a “search. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm
Samsung matters.) [read post]
