Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H." Results 601 - 620 of 875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
My own choice of the academic life was spurred in no small part by my search for an arena in which what matters is not which side you are on but the quality of your ideas. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
It’s simply a matter of trying to arm-twist a tenured, well-recognized scholar who takes a position that the Forces of Unanimity consider wrong. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:55 am
[Note also Jonathan's post, which takes a somewhat different approach than this post does, though I don't think there's any substantive disagreement between us.] [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:54 am
We read §109, which was silent on the matter, to prohibit Agency reliance on cost considerations. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:43 am
But the lack of an appropriation could matter a lot for insurers with heftier-than-expected costs. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
 Now I admit this may be the sort of technical minutae that only matters to us admin-law-nerd-types (especially those of us that worked on briefs in American Trucking), but if you’re going to assail someone for their errors, I think it’s important to get the story right. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:52 am
Drunken driving is a serious matter, but so is the loss of our freedom to come and go as we please without police interference. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:44 pm
 The President’s statement, which largely relies upon the stated position of the Bush Administration on similar matters, is below. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
 Unless there is actual evidence of another problem (and I’ve seen none) that should end the matter. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:42 am
Specifically, Section 3(A)(6) provides: A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:55 am
 With its jurisdiction at an end, the federal judicial panel on judicial conduct referred the matter to the Justice Department. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
Tuesday morning, as the Supreme Court hears oral argument in the two cases challenging the so-called contraception mandate (Sebelius v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 1:23 pm
That may matter as CNR appears to have quite extensive holdings based upon maps posted by Hinderaker. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
Oregon’s a bit of a different place, politically:  It was one of the first states to embrace ballot initiatives and has been home to a range of policy experiments, including doctor-assisted suicide, private property protections, and various environmental initiatives. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
 For standing purposes, it’s a matter of conjecture which firm is which. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Jonathan Tweedy’s discussion of Section 8(i) Settlements. [read post]