Search for: "Matter of Washington Group, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Jon Hyman
Dukes: What The Class-Action Decision Really Means for Employers – from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Why the Walmart Ruling is Good For Everyone – from Evil HR Lady Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
Julian Duplain reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
His Prior Pardons May Set the Stage for More USA Today – David Jackson, John Fritze, and Kevin Johnson | Published: 12/4/2020 As President Trump weighs granting pardons to close associates – and perhaps family members and even himself – experts said he may not pay much of a political price, no matter whom the recipients are. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm by Ben Vernia
 In August 2008, First Tennessee sold First Horizon to MetLife Bank N.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Finally, there seems to be recognition within Washington that existing laws and regulations have not kept pace with business practices - the need to regulate derivatives and hedge funds is no longer a matter of whether, but how. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The environmental group sued the EPA last year for not requiring Washington state to list its coastal waters as impaired by rising acidity under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm by Beth Taylor
The high-powered group of panelists included U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement came after EPA found that Oxarc, Inc. was in violation of the Risk Management Program requirements at four of their facilities which are located in North Lewiston and Nampa, Idaho and Pasco and Spokane, Washington. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Sai Vinod
UCA is applicable to foreign manufacturers as long as the product is sold in Washington or Louisiana. [read post]