Search for: "Merrick v. Merrick" Results 601 - 620 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
– Natalie Orpett, Executive Editor   The Jan. 6 Criminal Prosecutions As 2022 began, many wondered—including us—if Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department was taking the Capitol insurrection cases seriously enough and if his investigation would, as Garland promised on Jan. 5 of this year, truly reach those “at any level, whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
” Mindful of that, what do you think might have occurred if Chief Judge Merrick Garland (a former antitrust professor) had been confirmed? [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
I have finally finished reading the Mueller Report, slowly and with care. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, 130 people (out of 1.2-1.5 million) opted into the price-fixing case against JJB Sports concerning replica football shirts.[13] Likewise, barely 10,000 out of about 100,000 of Morrison’s employees joined the group action against the supermarket chain for unlawful disclosure of private data on the internet by another employee.[14] Furthermore, s.47C (2) of the Competition Act obviates the need for individual assessment of damages, but limits the requirement to prove damages to the… [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am by Ronald Collins
Even blocking or not taking up nominees, as happened to Merrick Garland, is hardly novel. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
  Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Is that trend likely to be reversed in our lifetime even if, for example, Chief Judge Merrick Garland were to be seated on the Court? [read post]