Search for: "Michael D" Results 601 - 620 of 16,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
One of the more entertaining examples of credential misrepresentation occurs in one of The D&O Diary’s favorite books, The Count of Monte Cristo, by Alexandre Dumas, in which Edmond Dantès dupes others into believing him to be a Count so that he can revenge himself on his enemies and tormentors. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Bloom, Regulating Antarctic Tourism: The Challenge of Consensus-Based Decision Making Letter to the Editor Sean D. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm by centerforartlaw
By Roxana Wang Shelby White is exactly the person you would expect to have invaluable kraters in her cupboard. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Annie Shiel
(Of note, a new bipartisan bill introduced in September by Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Michael Burgess (R-TX), the Drone Reform Act, would achieve this.) [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Alexander Gelfond
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3455381 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455381   Samuel Estreicher is the Dwight D. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am by Seán Binder
Edward Wong, Eric Schmitt, Michael D. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 2:24 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
Panera Contest Mark D., a regular Consumer World reader, got some good news recently. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:19 am by Dan Lopez
But as a refresher, I’d like to turn it over to Jean to provide some background information on the new draft merger guidelines. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:11 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Uday Ahlawat is a co-managing partner of Ahlawat & Associates in New Delhi, India, and a member of the International Lawyers Network. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Based on these facts, the Court "conclude[d] that [the] defendant's conviction and sentencing on three counts of discharging a firearm into [an] occupied property did not violate double jeopardy principles. [read post]