Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
The events in the United States over the past few days involving the creation of an executive order with a thinly-veiled Muslim ban demand a response. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Smith, which applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Troxell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
Miller, 405 F. 3d 700 (8th Cir. 2005); State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
The Court does not act as an appellate court and cannot overturn the decision of a domestic court. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Although the doctrine varies from state to state, it typically does not give rise to rights equivalent to a legal parent’s. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
(b) In this section, the term 'State' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
§ 29-4003(1)(a)(iv), applies SORA to any person who, on or after January 1, 1997, “[e]nters the state and is required to register as a sex offender under the laws of another village, town, city, state, territory, commonwealth, or other jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
§ 29-4003(1)(a)(iv), applies SORA to any person who, on or after January 1, 1997, “[e]nters the state and is required to register as a sex offender under the laws of another village, town, city, state, territory, commonwealth, or other jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
United States 15-565Issue: Whether vertical conduct by a disruptive market entrant, aimed at securing suppliers for a new retail platform, should be condemned as per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, rather than analyzed under the rule of reason, because such vertical activity also had the alleged effect of facilitating horizontal collusion among the suppliers. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
Vuotto, Jr., appears at DivorceMagazine.com: 1. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Chertoff, No. 07-1069 "Petition for review of an administrative removal order for overstaying a visa is granted and the case remanded where an alien who gains entry to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program by waiving his due-process rights to contest future removal must sign the waiver knowingly and voluntarily. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesWhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Doe, Olivas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
United States, 527 U.S. 1, 18 (1999). [read post]
