Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Granville, Justice O’Connor noted, “The composition of families varies greatly from household to household. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
Retired Justice O’Connor also spent some time on appeals court panels but apparently is no longer doing so. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O’Connor, both seen as swing justices, also both voted predominantly with the conservatives, although to a lesser degree than some of their more conservative counterparts. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Indeed, in his opinion he has to struggle mightily to distinguish Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s use of international law in Hamdi. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 10:01 pm
We’re catching up on cases leading up to our webcast tomorrow where Tom O’Connor and I will be talking about key eDiscovery case law for the first half of 2018. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
’”) State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm
For example, in 1981 President Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor, who would later vote to reaffirm the core holding of Roe. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Bollinger case in 2003, where O’Connor was the fifth vote joining the liberals and Kennedy was in dissent, until his surprising decision two years ago to uphold the University of Texas’s use of race in admissions in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice DeWine. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
” After Justice Samuel Alito replaced O’Connor on the Supreme Court, Kennedy in 2007 turned his Stenberg dissent into law. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
Roe survived after Justice Kennedy joined Justices O’Connor, Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter in keeping Roe alive, but modified, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
In a series of subsequent decisions, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor urged a more robust reading of the individualization requirement, arguing that capital defendants should be afforded “full consideration” of their mitigating evidence. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
”) State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
But Justice Sandra Day O’Connor did, too, only to be disappointed. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Rogeriee Thompson in Franchina v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Rogeriee Thompson in Franchina v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
In redistricting cases, Kennedy joined O’Connor’s 1993 majority opinion in Shaw v. [read post]
