Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES" Results 601 - 620 of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am by Randy Barnett
I find the opinion by the Chief Justice to be reasonable-sounding — just as I found those of Abbe and Nick. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Philip Bobbitt
  House of Representatives has voted to summon him to a trial. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
” Perry swiftly responded that in-house counsel for investment advisers to mutual funds can “wear many hats” and that when working on fund matters, they were representing the Janus mutual funds, not the JCM. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:28 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
One of my clients this morning was of the opinion that crime will rise as people struggle to make ends meet. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
A few weeks later, a divided three-judge panel decided on remand that the House of Representatives’s lawsuit to enforce their subpoena against McGahn must nonetheless be dismissed. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
 Far from representing a radical departure in the law, “the Court's reasoning upheld what had become a common opinion in the federal court system. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:16 pm
The unanimous court, in an opinion by Justice Mark Recktenwald, affirmed. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:14 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Concerned on court hearings   As someone who has spent about 25 years defending housing possession cases in the county court, I am becoming increasingly concerned at how things are now playing out, both in terms of the experiences of people using the courts and their ability to obtain justice. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
“Hopefully this decision will force TDCJ to reconsider housing prisoners in such dangerous conditions. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
 Although Representative Deutch may not see any problems from allowing cameras at the Supreme Court, the Justices themselves are adamant in their opposition to televising their proceedings. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
To be sure, they can communicate their opinions, and that is why the First Amendment’s free speech and press clauses are so important, but they can’t force their senators, representatives, or President to take any particular stand on any issue.The theory is that elected representatives need to be free from mob rule to choose the common good. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
At Concurring Opinions, Russell Engler argues that, “[f]rom an Access to Justice and Civil Right to Counsel perspective,” Turner “provides a basis for cautious optimism despite the opinion’s flaws. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
 Lord Neuberger, whose thoughts on open justice have been praised on this blog in the past, has recently given a speech at this year’s High Sheriff’s Lecture in Leeds, entitled “Justice in a time of economic crisis and in the age of the internet”. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am by Ilya Somin
But it's notable that all three largely avoided the subject of severability in the questions they posed to the lawyers representing California (leading a coalition of blue states) and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives (the parties that intervened to defend the ACA after the Trump administration refused to do so). [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Then-Judge Jackson heard oral argument in the matter, but Justice Jackson not participate in the writing of the opinion. [read post]