Search for: "Occupants of the Premises"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2020, 6:19 am
It is one of the few vehicles that markets itself on the premise that if you buy this vehicle, you are a risk-taker but do you really know the risks you are taking when you get behind the wheel of a Wrangler? [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:53 pm
Further, AB 685 relaxes the pre-citation requirements that the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“Cal/OSHA”) must follow before issuing a citation for a serious violation related to COVID-19. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:53 pm
Further, AB 685 relaxes the pre-citation requirements that the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“Cal/OSHA”) must follow before issuing a citation for a serious violation related to COVID-19. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
If an employer receives a notice of potential exposure to COVID-19, the employer must within one day provide written notice to all employees and subcontracted employee who were on the premises at the same worksite within the “infectious period. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
People who work in dangerous occupations, like construction or oil and gas, face an inherent risk of concussions on the job. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 12:03 pm
Rather, the existing workers’ compensation laws addressing occupational diseases contracted in the workplace will be used to adjudicate COVID-19 claims. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
[This guest post by Mr. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:15 pm
Once downloaded, the app activates WiFi and Bluetooth capabilities to keep track of which workers have been in close contact, and uses the phones’ GPS signals to determine when they are at the company’s premises. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
On its face, this increased occupancy appears to be good news, but it comes with a catch that may significantly impact many operators. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Dynamex held that in order to defeat claims arising under California’s Wage Orders premised on independent contractor misclassification, a defendant must prove that (A) the worker is free from control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with performing the work, both under contract and in fact, (B) the worker performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business, and (C) the worker customarily engages in an independently established trade,… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
In Dynamex, the California Supreme Court held that in order to defeat claims arising under California’s Wage Orders premised on independent contractor misclassification, a defendant must prove that: (A) the worker is free from control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with performing the work, both under contract and in fact; (B) the worker performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) the worker customarily engages in… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am
His petition (read here) alleged that in 1984 the co-op, by letter from its president, consented to the partnership’s subleasing of assigned portions of the unit to Liss and Sage for use by their separate businesses; that the letter further consented to Liss’s and Sage’s sub-subleasing to third parties of their respective portions of the unit so long as one or more of the partners remained in occupancy of at least 51% of the entire premises; and that… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Moreover, JSM had not initially raised the missing money after it went back into occupation, or when initially issuing the claim. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:53 am
Employees Covered: The Executive Order applies to “Food Sector Workers,” which it defines as any person who satisfies one of the following criteria: The person works in an industry or occupation covered by Wage Orders 3 (Canning, Freezing, and Preserving Industry), 8 (Industries Handling Products After Harvest), 13 (Industries Preparing Agricultural Products for Market, on the Farm), or 14 (Agricultural Occupations). [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 8:25 am
These claims would be for premises liability, or failure to keep the site reasonably safe. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Even assuming the dubious premise, the conclusion is incorrect. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
Such systems have been expanded well beyond the traditional professions to include other occupations where informational issues do not seem present. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 5:52 am
The premise that some workers could safely be granted a “passport” to return to work following an initial infection have now been proven to be false. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:19 pm
Ordinary dining use is permitted to involve a number of patrons (at any one time) equal to up to 50 percent of the venue's maximum occupancy, while wedding use is subject to the general 50-person gathering restriction. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:09 am
The applicable standard instead derives from such occupations as seamen and railroad workers and is premised on the transport of goods in interstate and foreign commerce, not where the goods themselves came from. [read post]
