Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 601 - 620 of 1,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
The Act, however, maintains other investor protections, such as those set forth in Section 501 of the Sarbanes-Oxley, which address potential con [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm by Jay Lechner
Most recently, the First Circuit in Lawson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:47 am by admin
Halliburton decision in September 2011 in which the ARB adopted a broad interpretation of the anti-retaliation provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
On appeal, the Secretary of Labor and the SEC both filed amicus briefs urging the Court of Appeals to agree that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) covers Lawson and Zang. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Richard Renner
Hopefully, it will do the same for the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit reversed a March 2010 decision in Lawson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm by William McGrath
Koss to reimburse Koss $242,419 in cash and 160,000 of options pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Mr. [read post]