Search for: "P. v. House" Results 601 - 620 of 3,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
It could not be said in this case that the enquiries made were such that no reasonable housing authority could have been satisfied as to their scope and scale, R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, ex p Bayani (1990) 22 H.L.R. 406. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am by Dave
But that was met with Mangion v Lewisham LBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1642 (assessment for incapacity benefit different from assessment for housing). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am by Dave
But that was met with Mangion v Lewisham LBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1642 (assessment for incapacity benefit different from assessment for housing). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Tribunal justified this distinction by referring to a number of B.C. cases, Mailloux v Tofino (District) at para 111, and Whistler (Resort Municipality) v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Of particular interest here is that part of the opinion and order (with thanks to Adam Savett of Securities Litigation Watch), in which the Court, after presuming and rebutting ABP being the most adequate plaintiff, presumes Union to be the most adequate (from p.13). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Giles Peaker
The interrelation of common law and s.11(1A) had been dealt with by the Court of Appeal in Passley v Wandsworth LBC (1998) 30 HLR 165, where pipes on the roof of a block had fractured in a cold snap, flooding Mr P’s flat. [read post]