Search for: "P. v. Self"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 6:26 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
However, the 2020 Final Call Letter also states that CMS will convene a technical advisory panel to periodically update the list of conditions that satisfy the necessary criteria.[12] CMS followed up the 2020 Final Call Letter with additional sub-regulatory guidance in the form of a letter to Medicare Advantage Organizations.[13] That letter listed as examples of permitted benefits, the following: meals beyond a limited basis; food and produce; transportation for non-medical needs; pest… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Norton describes Rust v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
Protecting Consumers and Health in a Common Market, Hart Publishing, 2007, p. 77 ss.; B. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am
The CJEU addressed the issue in 2011 in Red Bull v Frisdranken (C-119/10), however, the contract manufacturer in that case did not affix the infringing sign to the goods. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 10:17 am
Bateman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
Contents include:Carolina Moehlecke, The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty Anastassia V Obydenkova & Vinícius G Rodrigues Vieira, The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft: Regional Development Banks and Voting Alignment with the United States at the United Nations General Assembly Lauge N Skovgaard Poulsen, Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points Celeste Beesley, Foreign Policy… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:55 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
There are several approved self-administered biosimilars, but none actually launched; have some time before we see products where interchangeability would make a difference.Have heard from pharmacists that a different name may deter them from switching/may deter patients. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
In Dauksis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
(Separately, a parallel private action, Ploss v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
Estimable v. irreparable seems like another axis worth thinking about, as does discrete v. ongoing behavior. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Cengic v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm
(See Dynamex, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 952 [the wage orders are intended to accord workers “a modicum of dignity and self-respect”].) [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
Mercer v. [read post]
