Search for: "PEPPERS v. STATE"
Results 601 - 620
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
Further, at any given time, there is a state of the art. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Judge Moore’s comprehensive opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
CMH Homes, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:25 am
In this week’s opinion, Therasense Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Troubling comment pepper the Court's opinion. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am
On the other hand, the lawyer representing the state interests experienced difficulty describing a "manageable" lawsuit and was peppered with questions by the court's traditionally more liberal Justices. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:48 pm
United States just floored us. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, Case No. 10-290, a case that calls into question what the proper burden of proof is to invalidate a patent claim. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In Prior v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:06 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan peppered Mr. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
Id. at 27-29.She Pulls The (Claim)-Splitting State Law Counts Down? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:38 am
United States is here. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
You have probably already heard about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Pepper v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
In the press release announcing the complaint against the DHB independent directors, the Director of the Commission’s Division of Enforcement, Robert Khuzami, stated, “We will not second-guess the good-faith efforts of directors. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
