Search for: "PIERCE v PIERCE" Results 601 - 620 of 2,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Rev. 1235, 1303 (2007); Pierce, Democratizing the Administrative State, 48 Wm. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The author has kindly provided us with a brief summary of her key findings: 1) Tort Liability Claims are typically initiated in England by private partiesaffected by the activities of TNCs in the host (foreign) state.These arecivil liability cases in which the cause of actionagainst English-domiciled parent companiesis framed through the tort law concept of duty of carerather than the corporate law doctrine of piercing the corporate veil or customary international law on human rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:45 am
This shop sold cacti and associated plants under the name Prick (& the Britney Spears inspired company name Prick Me Baby One More Time).While cacti and tattoos are not often confused, the geographical proximity and similar names concerned Mr Martinez and led to a series of social media posts followed by the inevitable legal letter and claim: Martinez (t/a Prick) & Anor v Prick Me Baby One More Time Ltd (t/a Prick) & Anor [2018] EWHC 776 (IPEC).Some prickly issuesAt trial, there… [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 5:25 pm by Steve Bainbridge
US Third Circuit Senior Judge Jane Richards Roth issued a bizarre pronouncement in a recent veil piercing opinion: ... it is unclear that merely using a corporation to limit personal liability rises... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Andrew Hudson
Imposing liability on such persons has been a more recent development where the ‘corporate veil’ of a company’s liability has been ‘pierced’ to impose liability on officers and employees. [read post]