Search for: "Parent v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 13,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 8:50 am
E. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 10:15 am
The Arkansas Constitution was interpreted in Jegley v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am
This is the latest chapter in a series of cases that began with New York State Rifle Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:40 am
Gevo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
Let Guest & Gray fight for your family. 1 Lewelling v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:02 pm
” The appellate court stated that in determining whether the formula child support obligation is unjust or inappropriate, a court may consider “[t]he needs of the children of the non-custodial parent for whom the non-custodial parent is providing support who are not subject to the instant action. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:11 pm
The Court ruled in T.M.H. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:11 pm
The Court ruled in T.M.H. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:42 pm
"High court upheld child custody rights of non-biological parent": The Virginian-Pilot provides a news update that begins, "The Virginia Supreme Court has upheld a lower state court decision that grants some custody rights to the non-biological parent in a legal dispute between two women who jointly parented a child in a past lesbian relationship. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
The Utah Appellate court reversed and remanded back to the trial court finding that the grandparents had not presented sufficient evidence to overcome the compelling interest of the state that is narrowly construed (“tailored”) in favor of the fundamental right of the actual parent. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:28 am
K.D.H. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:10 am
In Wieland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
The Court of Appeals emphasized that implicit in factor (c) is an acknowledgment that weekly visitation is not possible when parents are separated by state borders. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
However, controversy stems both from the very character of the offence – the notion that it intrudes improperly on parental rights – and from the fact that it is an offence of strict liability – the prosecution does not need to prove that the parent acted in any way unreasonably in failing to secure the child’s attendance at school (see Islington LBC v D [2011] EWHC 990 (Admin)) or even that the parent knew about the absence (see Crump… [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:36 am
The post Parents of St. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Let’s work that back: If there is there is some evidence that suggests that any form of involvement would put the child at risk of harm then the parent is not a qualifying parent and the presumption doesn’t apply. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
” Smalling v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Chavez v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:00 am
The case of Matter of Barone v. [read post]
